Why do we Think Racially? Culture, Evolution, and Cognition
نویسندگان
چکیده
Contemporary research on racial categorization is mostly encompassed by two research traditions—social constructionism and the cognitive-cum-evolutionary approach. Although both literatures have some plausible empirical evidence and some theoretical insights to contribute to a full understanding of racial categorization, there has been little contact between their proponents. In order to foster such contacts, we critically review both traditions, focusing particularly on the recent evolutionary/cognitive explanations of racial categorization. On the basis of this critical survey, we put forward a list of eleven requirements that a satisfactory theory of racial categorization should satisfy. We conclude that despite some decisive progress, we are still far from having a complete theory of why humans classify people on the basis of skin color, body appearance or hair style.
منابع مشابه
Language and Cognition
What is the role of language in cognition? Do we think with words, or do we use words to communicate made-up decisions? The paper briefly reviews ideas in this area since 1950s. Then we discuss mechanisms of cognition, recent neuroscience experiments, and corresponding mathematical models. These models are interpreted in terms of a biological drive for cognition. Based on the Grossberg-Levine t...
متن کاملSocratic Hubris; A Way to Understanding Socrates Trial and Execution
There are several debates around why Socrates executed but none of them has explained why he executed at seventy. I think Socratic hubris can explain it. In fact, if we refer to “earlier Socrates” dialogues that cover life of Socrates from youth to seventy years, it is obvious that Socrates on effort to find and present a good life appealed to speech and used it to cross-examine Athenians. Howe...
متن کاملDo English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?
Time is a fundamental domain of experience. In this paper we ask whether aspects of language and culture affect how people think about this domain. Specifically, we consider whether English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently. We review all of the available evidence both for and against this hypothesis, and report new data that further support and refine it. The results demonstra...
متن کاملThe sapient mind: archaeology meets neuroscience
D. Stout, N. Toth, K. Schick and T. Chaminade Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain 1951 S. H. Frey Biology is only part of the story . 1959 D. Read and S. van der Leeuw Big brains, small worlds: material culture and the evolution of the mind 1969 F. Coward and C. Gamble Wild agency: nested intentionalities in cognitive neuroscience and archaeology 1...
متن کامل